SWG 09: Organizational Contradiction: Engaging Plurality, Stress and Contradictions

• Quinn, Robert Age., and you may Kim S. Cameron, eds. Paradox and you will Conversion: Towards the a theory regarding Improvement in Organization and you may Administration. Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1988. This modified volume comes with essays out of luminaries inside the business concept giving understanding about contradiction is also change that’s told from the proper thinking, business alter, telecommunications, and you will class personality. Such now antique essays give foundational wisdom to have applying contradiction concept to business phenomena.
• Smith, Kenwyn K., and you can David N. Berg. Paradoxes from Classification Life: Skills Argument, Paralysis, and you will Movement in-group Character. Bay area: Jossey-Trout, 1987. Smith and Berg determine contradiction since “an announcement otherwise group of statements that are self-referential and inconsistent and lead to a vicious loop” (p. 12). It trace the new origins of paradoxical thought drawing heavily with the psychoanalysis, and so they highlight twelve paradoxes within this communities and you may mix him or her from inside the around three additional groups: paradoxes out of that belong, paradoxes off interesting, and you can paradoxes from talking. Which text message even offers an early method of exploring paradox in this business phenomena.

Planners

Lewis, University of Cincinnati, USAElla Miron-Spektor, INSEAD, European countries University, FranceCamille Pradies, EDHEC Business College, FranceJonathan Schad, King’s College or university London, Joined KingdomWendy K. Smith, School out-of Delaware, Us

Business life confronts unprecedented complexity. Multiple and you can inconsistent wants, competing stakeholder means, and you may punctual-paced transform even more give rise to chronic and interwoven tensions, for example today and the next day, public missions and you may organization needs, centralization and you can decentralization, stability and alter. While conventional management look stresses contingency answers to build explicit options anywhere between solutions regarding a tension, a paradox approach underlines the https://sugardaddydates.net/sugar-daddies-usa/il/rockford/ worth of turning to competing needs additionally (Lewis, 2000). A paradox illustrates a good tension’s elements because contradictory and you can contradictory, yet and interdependent, interactive, and mutually constituted (Farjoun, 2010; Smith Lewis, 2011). Entertaining fighting means simultaneously enables continuous organizational sustainability.

The aim of SWG 09 would be to progress the understanding of plurality, stress, and you can contradictions to higher take part him or her to have managerial habit (look for Putnam et al., 2016; Schad mais aussi al., 2016).

Through the carried on sandwich-layouts in the EGOS Colloquia, we are in a position to further our very own comprehension of stress and contradictions, and you may and therefore establish obvious boundaries and significance. Building to your a thriving neighborhood away from students, we currently attempt to implement the new theoretical landscapes and you will explore methodological opportunities to discover the complete prospective out of paradox browse.

SWG 09: Organizational Paradox: Enjoyable Plurality, Stress and you will Contradictions

• Understanding the sourced elements of tensions: Stress try illustrated while the inherent so you can throwing as well as socially developed (Smith Lewis, 2011). Recent browse shows you you to definitely stress would be grounded on cutting-edge systems, that’s the reason they are hidden and get outstanding (Schad Bansal, 2018).
• Multiple, interwoven stress: Considering the pervasiveness out of multiple stress, scholars can get investigation co-thickness of tensions (Jarzabkowski mais aussi al., 2013), and that duration levels of an organizations (Andriopoulos Lewis, 2009), and certainly will end up being interrelationships one of stress (Sheep et al., 2017).
• Microfoundations: Exactly what are the microfoundations off paradoxes (Miron-Spektor mais aussi al., 2018)? What is the part off thinking – anxiety, ambivalence, vulnerability – during the retaining otherwise leverage paradoxical tensions (Vince Broussine, 1996)? Do you know the consequences for management and you may company (Hahn ainsi que al., 2014)?
• Paradoxes regarding huge and you will state-of-the-art challenges:Because of the altering landscaping away from teams and environment he is stuck within the (public opinions, governmental orientations, scientific, etc.) how does paradox because the a great lens modify in dealing with huge and you may cutting-edge challenges?
• This new strategies during the paradox browse: Preciselywhat are the new measures or combos out of steps which can help united states evaluate paradoxes empirically (Andriopoulos Gotsi, 2017; Jarzabkowski ainsi que al., 2019)? Have there been the newest method of triangulation informed by paradox idea, merging qualitative, decimal and you may experimental approaches? Can paradox principle gain benefit from the study out-of larger investigation otherwise simulations? Just how can paradox be employed to mention stress anywhere between principle and you may measures?