grams., geographical region, measurement out of MA, measurement off mathematics performance, gender, values top, and you can guide 12 months), we conducted the heterogeneity take to. Brand new Q sample (heterogeneity sample) have found the difference among impact products, ergo to understand more about which prospective moderator (i.elizabeth., data keeps) might have starred a task within these distinctions was required.

Geographical Part

Geographic countries was indeed noticed a potential moderate factor. The effect models were categorized towards the four greater organizations: United states, Europe, Asia or other areas. This new statistical heterogeneity one of the impression brands is shown (Q = , p = 0.01). Specifically, the studies that have Far eastern examples had the biggest feeling size (roentgen = ?0.41), as degree which have European examples shown the smallest perception proportions (roentgen = ?0.21). Likewise, the studies with us examples had more substantial impact proportions (roentgen = ?0.30) compared to corresponding classification in the European countries, while they had a smaller sized feeling dimensions as compared to associated class within the Asia.

Gender

The new reasonable analyses into the gender had been conducted due to a few actions. Very first, the category about this varying was in line with Ma’s (1999) investigation, therefore we opposed perhaps the mathematics stress-results hook up try significantly some other certainly about three kinds (men, females, and you can blended); the outcome recommended there were no variations among the many around three classes (Q = cuatro.62, p = 0.099). Next, this study tended to extend subsequent to check on when to prohibit the fresh new confuse feeling on combined class and you can perhaps the mediocre correlations between female and male was in fact notably some other. Just 7 studies that considering the fresh relationship anywhere between MA and you may math efficiency otherwise vital information will be gone to live in perception types to own additional genders was incorporated. The outcome advised no factor anywhere between girls (r = ?0.30) and you can guys (roentgen = ?0.18) (Q = 2.73, p = 0.098).

Degree Peak

Four hot-dog dating degrees-peak teams was in fact formed within this meta-analysis, and additionally a simple group, junior large group, older higher class, blend classification, and you will college classification. The outcomes recommended which variable had significant outcomes into the mathematics anxiety-efficiency hook (Q = , p = 0.02). A great deal more especially, the fresh elderly highest category encountered the prominent mathematics stress-performance link (r = ?0.44), followed by the new junior highest classification (roentgen = ?0.39), college (r = ?0.33), primary (r = ?0.27), and you may blended category, which in fact had the smallest math nervousness-overall performance connect (roentgen = ?0.21).

Book Years

The modern meta-investigation consisted of committed physical stature from 19 years (2000–2018). To evaluate whether or not big date had an impact on this new math nervousness-results link, a Pearson relationship was used between your book age therefore the of all of the private studies (r = 0.27, p > 0.05). Zero correlation is found anywhere between perception sizes and the publication years (Profile 4).

Measurement off MA

I along with browsed whether the balances familiar with attempt mathematics nervousness had an impact on new math nervousness-show connect. The outcomes recommended the dimensions away from MA had no impact with the math anxiety-show connect (Q = 6.54, p = 0.48). Particularly, individual degree that used other scales (elizabeth.g., the latest Mathematics Stress Measure to have Basic University Pupils [MASESS; Bindak, 2005] had the premier math nervousness-efficiency hook up (r = ?0.41), accompanied by training that used new MAS (roentgen = ?0.40), MARS (r = ?0.35), MAQ (r = ?0.28), MASYC (roentgen = ?0.26), CMAQ (roentgen = ?0.24), SEMA (roentgen = ?0.24), and you will AMAS (roentgen = ?0.24), and you may private training which used the fresh MASC encountered the littlest mathematics anxiety-overall performance hook up (r = ?0.15).

Dimension from Mathematics Efficiency

The classification criteria used to code the “math performance” variable are different. In terms of the testing aspects of the math performance test, two skills were highlighted: calculation and problem solving. In this study, the measurement aspects of the test had significant effects on the math anxiety-performance link (Q = , p < 0.01). Studies that evaluated mixed math performance (calculation and problem solving) reported the largest effects (r = ?0.37). In addition, it is worth noting that studies in which the test assessed problem-solving skills in math performance reported larger effects (r = ?0.33), while studies that assessed the calculation ability in math performance reported smaller effects (r = ?0.21). In terms of the form of the math performance test, three types of math performance tests were identified: custom test, standardized test and others. There was a significant difference among these conditions (Q = , p = 0.001). The results suggested that studies that adopted a standardized test custom test reported larger effects (r = ?0.33) than studies that adopted a standardized test (r = ?0.28). Moreover, the studies that adopted other math tests reported the largest effects (r = ?0.51).