To help you evaluate our very own second hypothesis, we first recoded, each of the things that to the updates size, brand new portion of solutions one to reveal in the event the husbands have less, equivalent or more results, namely, condition, with hypogamy, for example husbands have all the way down reputation than spouses, homogamy, meaning equal status, and you can hypergamy, definition husbands with higher condition than simply wives. To the possible organization regarding nation, analyses have been high within the degree (X dos =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can monetary feeling of a potential breakup (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Study indicated that, to possess Language people, discover far more studies hypogamy, whereas to have Dominican users you will find so much more studies homogamy. Regarding financial factors if there is divorce case, while there is even more homogamy to possess Spanish members, there was a lot more hypergamy for Dominicans (see Contour step https://datingranking.net/nl/alua-overzicht/ one).

Having previous marriages or perhaps not wasn’t related so you’re able to variations in position. Regarding potential relationship between status and you can age hitched, high contacts were used in health (X dos =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), although getting couples y is out there (forty.4%, each), to own couples y prevails (43.4%). This means that, to the class with increased age hitched, husbands has actually all the way down fitness reputation. That have students of previous marriages and achieving pupils off current marriage didn’t significantly affect reputation.

During the sum, the latest analyses in regards to the second hypothesis showed that in contrast to all of our standards, the most significant feature associated to help you standing ‘s the country.

Univariate screening revealed high variations in factor step 1 (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Ultimately, hypogamy factors in the The country of spain scored notably less than hypogamy things during the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).